Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Douglas et al v. Sell et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Dalton Douglas
Defendant:
Steven J. Sell, TIMOTHY S. BENSLEY, Glenn Sobotka and others
Dalton et al v. Innov8tive Nutrition Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Ann Dalton and Ambitchous LLC
Defendant:
Innov8tive Nutrition Inc, LaCore Enterprises LLC, Mike Lohner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dalton v. Canal Insurance Co et al
as 5:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Makaylah Dalton
Defendant:
Canal Insurance Co, RMS Trans, Inc., Roderick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Miller v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dalton Grant Miller
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Sheriff - Shelby County Jail
as 9:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Dalton Grant Miller
Respondent:
Sheriff - Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dalton Grant Miller
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dalton Barnett
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Lewis Motor Company doing business as Hawg Country Auto, Cavenaugh Ford Lincoln LLC doing business as Cavenaugh Lincoln and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Harrell v. 701 Medical Department et al
as 4:2023cv04825
Plaintiff:
Kody Dalton Harrell
Defendant:
701 Medical Department and 1200 Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv01105
Petitioner:
Gregory James Dalton
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
