Cases 1 - 10 of 2,867
Russell et al v. New Punch Bowl Austin Domain, LLC D/B/A Punch Bowl Social et al
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Carl Russell, Christopher Thompson and Aracely Garcia
Defendant:
New Punch Bowl Austin Domain, LLC D/B/A Punch Bowl Social, New PBS Brand Co., LLC, Ben Petko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Russell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Russell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01448
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conness v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Matthew Russell Conness
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00507
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tamborello v. Town of Highland Park, Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Sam C Tamborello
Defendant:
Town of Highland Park, Texas, William (Bill) Lindley, Tobin Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keeter v. Waddell et al
as 7:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jackie Russell Keeter
Defendant:
Michael Waddell, Nickey Vazquez, Seth Lippert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
