Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Polk v. USA
as 3:2024cv00520
Petitioner:
John A. Polk
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Polk v. Texas Department of Insurance et al
as 4:2024cv02198
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Polk
Defendant:
Texas Department of Insurance and Texas Insurance Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fregia v. Warden Marshall, et al.
as 6:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Defendant:
Sgt. John Doe, Warden Unknown Marshall, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgado v. Raspberry et al
as 9:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Maria Delgado
Defendant:
Sarah Raspberry, Jamie Richardson, Shelly Sitton and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Polk et al v. City of Port Lavaca et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Dolores Polk and Daniel Polk
Defendant:
City of Port Lavaca, John Smith Officer # 1, John Smith Officer # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 9:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00726
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01097
Petitioner:
Nelson Alexander Polk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Polk
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terri Polk
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
