Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lopez v. Kendall et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III, Daniel Peterson, Anthony Scharf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lopez v. Kendall
as 23-50844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Kendall, III, Secretary of the Air Force and Mary D. Garcia, Human Resource Specialist, Employee Relations Labor, Laughlin Air Force Base
Lopez v. Kendall
as 22-50411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Kendall, III, Secretary of the Air Force and Mary D. Garcia, Human Resource Specialist, Employee Relations Labor, Laughlin Air Force Base
Lopez v. Roth et al
as 5:2021cv00646
Plaintiff:
Arturo S. Lopez, Jr. and Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Roth and Mary D. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Arturo Lopez-Agustin v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60545
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ARTURO EDUARDO LOPEZ-AGUSTIN
Atkinson v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2018cv13940
Defendant:
Deal Freight Fleet Inc., Arturo Garriga-Lopez and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duarte-Lopez v. USA
as 4:2016cv00475
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Arturo Duarte-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Arturo Garcia
as 16-50511
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARTURO GARCIA, also known as Arturo Garcia Lopez
Lopez v. Wine Group, Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01131
Plaintiff:
Arturo A Lopez
Defendant:
Wine Group, Inc, Wine Group, LLC, California Natural Products and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Argueta-Lopez v. USA
as 4:2013cv00144
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jaime Arturo Argueta-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
