Cases 1 - 10 of 27
White v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Paula B. White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01766
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sergio Leal v. Magic Auto Touch Up, Inc., et al
as 19-10467
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES B. WHITE, CHARLES R. WHITE, JR. and MAGIC TOUCH UP, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SERGIO LEAL, and all others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. 216(b)
White et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05479
Plaintiff:
Rhodes B White and Paul V White
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. USA
as 2:2016cv01093
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lane B White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Francisco Pena v. Texas Medical Board, et al
as 16-40451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO I. PENA, M.A. M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, ROBERTA M. KALAFUT, D.O., Former President, Texas Medical Board, KEITH MILLER, Former Member, Texas Medical Board and others
Leal v. Magic Auto Touch Up Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Sergio Leal
Defendant:
Magic Auto Touch Up Inc, Magic Touch Up Inc, Charles R White, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pena v. Texas Medical Board et al
as 5:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Francisco I. Pena
Defendant:
Texas Medical Board , Roberta M. Kalafut , Keith Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Seys v. Doucet et al
as 3:2014cv02883
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Seys
Defendant:
Julie Doucet, Gary Fitzsimmons and Earnest B White, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
