Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fides v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06893
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christiane M Fides
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph et al v. Denka Performance Elastomer LLC et al
as 2:2018cv09995
Plaintiff:
Eckert C. Green, Nelwyn LeBoeuf, Herbert T. Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, DowDuPont, Inc., Denka Performance Elastomer LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickinson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02069
Plaintiff:
William E. Dickinson , Larry . Anderson , Verne R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anshutz et al v. Gaviola
as 4:2012cv00808
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Anshutz , Amanda Hall and Michael Vela
Defendant:
Christian M Gaviola
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Knudsen v. Spyglass Trading, L.P.
as 3:2010cv01961
Plaintiff:
Christian M Knudsen
Defendant:
Spyglass Trading, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Christian Randolph v. Texas Rehabilitation Cmsn, et al
as 09-50613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTIAN M RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS REHABILITATION COMMISSION, ESTER DIAZ, also known as Mary Esther Diaz, REYES GONZALES, also known as Ray and others
Randolph v. TX Rehab Commission, et al
as 08-51258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTIAN M RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS REHABILITATION COMMISSION, ESTER DIAZ, also known as Mary Esther Diaz, REYES GONZALES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA, et al v. Jimenez-Montoya
as 08-50775
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTIAN M JIMENEZ-MONTOYA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
