Cases 1 - 10 of 18
USA v. Roberson
as 22-30446
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daryl Deon Roberson, also known as Daryldeon Roberson, also known as XX, also known as Deon Roberson, also known as Daryl Roberson, also known as Daryl D. Roberson
Roberson v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2019cv12938
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Roberson
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberson v. Ouachita Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv01285
Defendant:
Doctor Parker and Ouachita Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Vincent D Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Ouachita Correctional Center et al
as 2:2019cv11585
Defendant:
Doctor Parker and Ouachita Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Vincent D. Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Ouachita Correctional Center
as 3:2019cv00707
Plaintiff:
Vincent D Roberson
Defendant:
Ouachita Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrol Roberson v. McDonald Transit Associates, et al
as 17-60783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARROL D. ROBERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MCDONALD TRANSIT ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, OXFORD TRANSIT MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED and OFFICER RON BRIGGS
Roberson v. McDonald Transit Associates, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Carrol D. Roberson
Defendant:
McDonald Transit Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberson v. McDonald Transit Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Carrol D. Roberson
Defendant:
McDonald Transit Associates, Inc. and RATP Inc., Paris, France
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrol Roberson v. McDonald Transit Assoc, Inc.
as 13-60856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARROL D. ROBERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MCDONALD TRANSIT ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Toliver v. Sherman Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
Andrew Toliver
Defendant:
Sherman Police Department, Catherine Craig, D. Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
