Cases 1 - 10 of 576
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00874
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Damon Evans
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wade v. Lemonds et al
as 3:2024cv01199
Defendant:
Clayton Lemonds d/b/a Lemonds Trucking, Canal Insurance Company and Clayton Lemonds
Plaintiff:
Damon Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Baldone
as 2:2024cv02114
Defendant:
Damon J. Baldone
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association d/b/a Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Richardson v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00233
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Petitioner:
Damon Jerome Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
U.S. Bank Trust Company, et al v. Noble et al
as 4:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust Company
Defendant:
Darrick Noble, Odis Devaughn, Tasha Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ross v. USA
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jeremy Damon Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Damon J. Baldone, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Damon J. Baldone, LLC
Defendant:
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, Hilltop Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Shahrashoob v. Texas A&M University
as 23-20618
Plaintiff:
Zahra Shahrashoob
Defendant:
Texas A&M University, Texas A & M System, Texas A&M Board of Regents and others
USA v. Skyler
as 24-40067
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kimondra Damon Skyler, also known as Mondra
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
