Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Tucker v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Terry Tucker
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Kelli Hayes, Debra Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
London v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Nelson London
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv05621
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Jones
Defendant:
Medical Department Caddo Correctional Center, Medical Director Caddo Correctional Center, Nurse Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Prator et al
as 5:2021cv00620
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Rick Farris, David Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Caddo Police Dept et al
as 5:2019cv00290
Defendant:
Caddo Police Dept, Staff Caddo Correctional Center, David Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Royreguies Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimbrell et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Lowrance, Martha Maroon, Jacob Mills and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, VM North America Inc, Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Green v. Nelson et al
as 5:2016cv00604
Plaintiff:
Quantrus Terrell Green
Defendant:
David Nelson and Kelly Hays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Prator et al
as 5:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Fair, Donna Ferdinand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2015cv02911
Plaintiff:
Warren Bryant, II
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Steve Prator, D Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Vannortrick v. Robert Wyche, et al
as 15-31100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY VANNORTRICK, also known as Roy Van Nortrick
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WYCHE, SHEILA WRIGHT, DAVID NELSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
