Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dey v. North Richland Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Nzingha Bluefoot Dey
Defendant:
North Richland Hills Police Department, North Richland Hills Municipal Court, Jeremy K. Noe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dey v. Young et al
as 4:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Nzingha Bluefoot Dey
Defendant:
Cecile Erwin Young, Cynthia E. Hernandez, Danielle Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paradisus Dei v. IPV, Ltd. et al
as 4:2022cv02437
Plaintiff:
Paradisus Dei
Defendant:
IPV, Ltd. and Keycode Media
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
HWZ Property, LLC et al v. Wilshire Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
HWZ Property, LLC and Deying Zheng
Defendant:
Wilshire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gardner-Dey v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13013
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joan Gardner-Dey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mater Dei-Sugarland, LLC et al v. Copeland et al
as 4:2018cv03044
Defendant:
Kelly Copeland, Fatima Partners International, Inc., Fatima Life Care Plan, Inc, and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Zammit, Mater Dei-Sugarland, LLC and Ralph Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dey v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00569
Plaintiff:
Teresa Dey
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Fisher-Dey v. Moore
as 1:2016cv00343
Petitioner:
Ardie Dean Fisher-Dey
Respondent:
Dan Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Fisher-Dey v. Moore
as 6:2016cv01191
Petitioner:
Ardie Dean Fisher-Dey
Respondent:
Dan Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
