Cases 1 - 10 of 642
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patent Armory Inc. v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 4:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Kelley v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dow Kelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shelvin v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Quincy Shelvin
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company and Ineos Americas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brown v. Texas Dow Credit Union
as 4:2024cv02010
Plaintiff:
Ryan Brown
Defendant:
Texas Dow Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rogers v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
John Rogers
Defendant:
Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Eagle, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Jennings v. Empress Dow Dolle et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Prince George Jennings
Defendant:
Empress Dow Dolle, Turn Key Realty and Mariah Harding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kohute v. Dow Corporate Headquarters
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
Dow Corporate Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
