Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Housden v. Esaw et al
as 3:2024cv02763
Plaintiff:
Jordan Housden
Defendant:
ALKS & LM Trucking Inc and Sylvester Esaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lampkin v. Unknown et al
as 6:2024cv00372
Defendant:
Michael Cooper, William C. Burns, Joell Reing and others
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lampkin v. Corder et al
as 6:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
Chaplain Jerry Corder and Cody Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampkin v. Cox et al
as 6:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
Dannal Cox, R.S. Simmons, Ann Q. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampkin v. Cox
as 6:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Esaw Lampkin
Respondent:
State of Texas ADA Daniel Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Renfro v. Lumpkin
as 23-40160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rashard Esaw Renfro
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Jonathan S. Joseph, Lieutenant and Onyemuch E. Ogu, Correctional Officer
Lampkin v. Perrini et al
as 6:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
Chief P.D. Officer Jason Perrini, P.D. Officer FNU Batman, Ann Q. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garza, et al v. The University of Phoenix, et al
as 5:2021cv01221
Plaintiff:
Elisa Garza, Rowland Estrada, Stanly Isaq and others
Defendant:
The University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Education Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lampkin v. Amonett et al
as 5:2021cv00270
Petitioner:
Esaw Lampkin
Respondent:
A Amonett, David Reed, FNU Mermea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renfro v. Baker et al
as 4:2021cv02172
Defendant:
Bruce Fredricks, Dale Wainwright, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Rashard Esaw Renfro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
