Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Foulk v. Flagstar Bank et al
as 3:2023cv02864
Plaintiff:
Frank Foulk
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank and Alessandro Deinello
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Foulkes v. Garrison Property And Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01533
Plaintiff:
Annette Foulkes
Defendant:
Garrison Property And Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Foulkes v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00578
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Foulkes
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foulke v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv04001
Plaintiff:
Edward James Foulke
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Anthony Foulk
as 13-10399
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY DALE FOULKS
Anderson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv00147
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. , Unomedical, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Anderson , Patricia Bailey , Jennifer Balderas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riches et al v. Hungness et al
as 2:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Gulietti, Daniel Anthony Weymouth and others
Defendant:
Kristen Hungness, Amanda Hughes, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearing v. The Monroe County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
D'Wayne Dearing
Defendant:
The Monroe County Sheriff's Department, Dusty Rollison, Carolyn Rollison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kulik v. U.S. Department of Labor et al
as 4:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Kulik
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration, Elaine L Chao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
