Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Funches v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. McCleave et al
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Charmaine McCleave, Latrease Funches and M. Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00152
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dixon et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2020cv03263
Plaintiff:
Funches Dixon and Sharese Dixon
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG and Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC v. Funches et al
as 3:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Joseph Russell May, Roy L. Funches, Unknown Heirs of Bertha Funches and others
Plaintiff:
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Funches v. Merit Health Central et al
as 3:2019cv00682
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Merit Health Central
Plaintiff:
Robert Funches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Funches v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2019cv12624
Defendant:
Lilian Arana, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Olivia Funches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Andre Funches, Sr. v. MS Development Authority, et al
as 19-60651
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE FUNCHES, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENN MCCULLOUGH, In Their Individual Capacity, JAY MCCARTHY, In Their Individual Capacity, MISSISSIPPI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall v. Funches, et al
as 2:2018cv08393
Defendant:
Donald D Funches, Unidentified Party, Celadon Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
