Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Garron
as 4:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Demarcus Garron
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Presswood et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02165
Plaintiff:
Garron Presswood
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Research & Development LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Johnson & Johnson Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America, N.A. v. Ashley, et al
as 1:2017cv00609
Defendant:
Deborah R. Ashley, Garron F. Ashley, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. [MERS] and others
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Bowers v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2016cv00013
Petitioner:
Adam Heath Garron Bowers
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Omar Garron-Morale
as 14-50722
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OMAR GARRON-MORALES, also known as Omar Carreon-Morales, also known as Faustino Omar Carreon-Morales
Garrone et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrone and Pamela Caldwell
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garron Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-10933
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARRON PAUL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Davis v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00510
Petitioner:
Garron Paul Davis
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
