Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Crossland v. Bartel et al
as 4:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Tonya Crossland
Defendant:
Harry Lee Bartel and Ghumms Auto Center of Dodge City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Davis v. Lee
as 2:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Larry Davis
Defendant:
Harry Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Lee et al
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Larry Davis
Defendant:
Harry Lee and Joseph Lopinto
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boggs v. Tarrant County Clerk of Courts
as 4:2021cv00383
Petitioner:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr
Respondent:
Tarrant County Clerk of Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Bridge Houses Program of LA et al
as 3:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Winn Dixie Stores of Louisiana, West Jefferson Mental Center Hospital, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roussel v. Pennington et al
as 3:2019cv00427
Plaintiff:
Ryan M Roussel
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, United Natural Foods, Inc., Geico Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs v. Salvant et al
as 4:2019cv00386
Petitioner:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Respondent:
Sharen Wilson, Thomas A Wilder, Wayne Salvant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moses v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2018cv01302
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Bexar County, FNU Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Moses, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Salazar et al
as 5:2018cv00284
Defendant:
Officer FNU Aldania, O. Amadin, Judge FNU Curther and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harry Boudreaux v. U S Framing Incorporated, et al
as 18-30050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY LEE BOUDREAUX
Defendant - Appellee:
C J R FRAMING INCORPORATED and ROCKINGHAM CASUALTY COMPANY, incorrectly named as Rockingham Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
