Cases 1 - 10 of 351
Adams v. Kaplan et al
as 6:2024cv01223
Defendant:
Joshua Hardy, Irvin Cates, Robert Lemay and others
Plaintiff:
Annette Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Kaplan et al
as 6:2024cv01222
Defendant:
Police Dept of Kaplan, Joshua Hardy, Irvin Cates and others
Plaintiff:
Boyd Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for GSAMP Trust 2006-FM2 v. Irvin
as 4:2024cv03214
Plaintiff:
deutsche bank national trust company, as trustee for gsamp trust 2006-fm2, mortgage pass-through certificates, series 2006-fm2,
Defendant:
Cecilia Robinson Irvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Odem, Jr. v. Muniz et al
as 9:2024cv00167
Defendant:
Jarry D. Adams, Troy W. Driskell, State Classification Subsequent Hearing Committee Member #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Irvin v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv02050
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Gladys Kaye Irvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kemp v. Shreveport PD
as 24-30167
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kemp
Defendant:
Shreveport Police Department, Ross Owens, R. Lee Irvin, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
