Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Winding v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Govornor Tate Reeves, MDCO Commissioner Burl Cain, MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Judge Michael E. Mery, et al.
as 5:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
Judge Michael E. Mery, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnem v. Lynch
as 1:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Lavern Burnem
Defendant:
Judge Michael Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kallinen v. Newman
as 22-20383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randall Kallinen
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Michael Newman
Jackson v. Lyons et al
as 3:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Courtjay Jackson
Defendant:
Linda Lyons, John Lantern, Mississippi Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Kallinen v. Newman
as 4:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Randall Kallinen
Defendant:
Judge Michael Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edison v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Edison
Defendant:
Anderson County Sheriff's Office, Jay Ruscle, Rudy Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rishell v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2021cv01052
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rishell
Defendant:
State of Texas, Javier Salazar, Judge Michaels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv02158
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Judge Michael Miller and Gail Miller
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Incorporated and Johnson & Johnson Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins v. Newman
as 21-20355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sheila Owens Collins
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Michael Newman, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Justice of the Probate Court of Harris County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
