Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Torres v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Warden Jacqueline Jones, FNU Barker, Sgt. FNU Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Amelia Marie Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michelle Morris v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 19-51104
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JACQUELINE JONES, WARDEN KELLI FORRESTER and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE A. MORRIS
Kenneth Taylor v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 19-40302
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC C. MILLER, JACQUELINE JONES and BRYAN COLLIER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH TAYLOR
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06103
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer AG and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01662
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jones
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
as 2:2017cv14394
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jones
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth Taylor v. Bryan Coller et al.
as 3:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Taylor
Defendant:
Bryan Coller, Jacqueline Jones and Eric C. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaney v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv02808
Defendant:
Jacqueline Jones, Landon Dowden and City of Leesville
Plaintiff:
Darian Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
