Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McMurry v. Weaver
as 26-50541
Plaintiff:
Megan Marie McMurry, Individually and as next friend of J.M., Adam Seth McMurry, Individually and as next friend of J.M. and Alesia Jade McMurry, Individually and as next friend of J.M.
Defendant:
Alexandra Weaver and Kevin Brunner
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jade M. Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cornia v. Jasper Engine Exchange, Inc.
as 5:2026cv02902
Plaintiff:
Jade W. Cornia
Defendant:
Jasper Engine Exchange, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jackson v. Raymond Laborde Correctional Center et al
as 1:2026cv01439
Plaintiff:
Nathan Jackson
Defendant:
Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Gary Westscott, Brent Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Jade Marine Inc
as 2:2026cv00864
Petitioner:
Jade Marine Inc
Claimant:
James R. Pogue
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30504 Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Strong et al v. Gomez et al
as 1:2026cv00961
Plaintiff:
Kalana Strong and Jade Jones
Defendant:
Oscar Gomez, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. and Deluxe Auto Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Cone v. Sanofi-Aventis
as 26-30180
Plaintiff:
Deenen Cone, Joel J. Burns, as surviving husband, Executor, and Trustee, Jeannie Hamilton-Moews and others
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S., L.L.C. and Sanofi U.S. Services, Incorporated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thabata v. Vidaurri et al
as 5:2026cv00914
Plaintiff:
Hosam Thabata
Defendant:
Jade Vidaurri and DoorDash Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
