Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Penton v. Walthall County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Keith Penton
Defendant:
Walthall County, Mississippi, Sheriff Kyle Breland, Warden Cherie Bailey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00608
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Jones
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00366
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Jones and Robert Jones
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon LLC, American Medical Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00651
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Brown
Defendant:
Jimmy Jones, Unknown Rhems, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company v. S & J Poultry Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00200
Defendant:
S & J Poultry Construction, LLC, Jimmy Jones, Darren Shows and others
Plaintiff:
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Alexia Hines, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90050
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ALEXIA HINES, KAYLA HOLLINS, TYNEISHA HOLLOWAY and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
United States of America v. Funk
as 4:2015mc00890
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Jimmie Jones Funk
Hines et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00692
Plaintiff:
Alexia Hines , Kayla Hollins , Tyneisha Holloway and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandvik Customer Finance, L.L.C. v. J.J. Concrete & Materials, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05588
Plaintiff:
Sandvik Customer Finance, L.L.C.
Defendant:
J.J. Concrete & Materials, Inc., Jimmie Jones, Sr. and Dorothy Fay Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. USA
as 3:2013cv00129
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jimmy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
