Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Santana v. Cox
as 2:2020cv00298
Petitioner:
Jose Mauricio Santana
Respondent:
Mr Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chambers v. Santana
as 3:2018cv00820
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
Jose A Santana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carcache v. Gyires et al
as 5:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Omar Carcache
Defendant:
Marton Gyires, Danielle Sylvester-Pierre, Pamela L. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Okey Okpala v. Vasquez, et al
as 17-60135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OKEY GARRY OKPALA
Defendant - Appellee:
N. VASQUEZ, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Beaumont (low) Texas, LACY, United Manager, Federal Correctional Institution, Beaumont (low) Texas, EDWARDS, Case Manager, Federal Correctional Institution, Beaumont (low) Texas and others
Okpala v. Vasquez et al
as 5:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
FNU Vasquez, FNU Lacy, FNU Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwindling v. Samuels et al
as 1:2015cv00049
Petitioner:
George A Schwindling
Respondent:
Charles E Samuels, Frank Lara and Jose A Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schwindling v. Samuels et al
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
George A Schwindling
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Frank Lara and Jose A Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kamal Patel v. Jose Santana, et al
as 11-10393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE NUNEZ SANTANA, Regional Designator, JASON A SICKLER, Regional Counsel and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Patel v. Santana, et al
as 08-10948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE NUNEZ SANTANA, Regional Designator, JASON A SICKLER, Regional Counsel and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
