Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Reynolds v. Shelby County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Reynolds
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Gonzales and John Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. R1 RCM Inc
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Raymond L Reynolds
Defendant:
R1 RCM Inc doing business as Medical Financial Solutions
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2020cv01780
Defendant:
Don Koening, L Reynolds and Rosa Unknown
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2019cv00427
Defendant:
Don Koening, L Reynolds and Rosa Unknown
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Theresa L. Reynolds v. Kroger Texas, L.P. et al
as 4:2016xc00975
Defendant:
Kroger Texas, L.P. , The Kroger Co. and Kroger A/K/A Kroger #213
Plaintiff:
Theresa L. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. Kroger Texas LP et al
as 3:2016cv02950
Defendant:
Kroger Texas LP , The Kroger Co and Kroger
Plaintiff:
Theresa L Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. Voelkel et al
as 2:2016cv06984
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Reynolds
Defendant:
Christine L. Voelkel and Jacques F. Bezou, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2012cv03136
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandra L. Reynolds
Garnishee:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Michael Reynolds v. Lynda Russell, et al
as 11-40698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNDA K. RUSSELL, District Attorney and NICOLE FAULKNER, Investigator Center City Police Department
Michael Reynolds v. Newton Johnson
as 11-40368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEWTON JOHNSON, Sheriff, Shelby County Sheriff's Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
