Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daniel Manopla, et al v. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 20-20487
Defendant / Appellee:
Pablo Lapuerta, Jeffrey L. Wade, Lonnel Coats and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul E. Callinan and Jorge Rivera
Manopla v. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00301
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manopla
Defendant:
Lonnel Coats, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Jeffrey L Wade
Wade v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05225
Plaintiff:
David L Wade
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade et al v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi et al
as 2:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
George L. Wade, Jr. and Estate of George L. Wade, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Demetrius Breland, Narottam Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade et al v. Officer Demetrius Breland et al
as 2:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
George L. Wade, Jr. and Estate of George L. Wade, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg, MS, Demetrius Breland, Narottam Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawes v. Dupuy et al
as 3:2011cv00142
Defendant:
Ulyses Addison, Jr., Kyle Alford, All Current City Council Members and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Dawes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Negi et al
as 1:2010cv00799
Plaintiff:
Jessie L Wade
Defendant:
Shivani Negi, Barbara Watkins, Hollis Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Negi et al
as 1:2010cv00664
Plaintiff:
Bertha M Hamilton, Dennis M Egelston, Lavelle T Tullis and others
Defendant:
Shivani Negi, Barbara Watkins, Hollis Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Negi et al
as 6:2010cv00664
Plaintiff:
Bertha M Hamilton, Dennis M Egelston, Tullis T Lavelle and others
Defendant:
Shivani Negi, Barbara Watkins and Hollis Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
