Cases 1 - 10 of 4,545
Talley v. Mumford et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Gerald Mumford, Judge Johnnie McDaniels, Judge Kenneth Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Lewis
as 24-20235
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larry Odell Lewis, also known as Lavish
Lewis v. ACE American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
David Fabian Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company and Tennessee Steel Haulers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. v. 100.000 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, et al
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Defendant:
100.000 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS,, Mr. Harry David Schwarz, III, Mr. Roger Joseph Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Williams v. Red's Roadrunner Transport, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Artez Shabazz Williams
Defendant:
Red's Roadrunner Transport, Inc. and Roger Lewis Farley
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Brown v. Hospira
as 24-30325
Plaintiff:
Ada Brown, Chantel Brown, Gwen Burnstein and others
Defendant:
Hospira Worldwide, L.L.C., formerly known as Hospira Worldwide, Incorporated, Sandoz, Incorporated, Accord Healthcare, Incorporated and others
Lewis v. Williamson Cty, TX
as 24-50384
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Williamson County, Texas
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LaCaze et al v. Wal-Mart Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Candise LaCaze and Lewis LaCaze
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc and Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
