Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mabee v. Accent Food Services, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00181
Plaintiff:
Charles Mabee
Defendant:
Accent Food Services, LLC and Ken Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
David Franco v. Mabe Trucking Company, Inc., et al
as 19-30316
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD AGEE, MABE TRUCKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and NATIONAL INTERSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID FRANCO
Mabe v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01191
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Precision Spine Care v. Mabe Trucking Co., Inc.
as 6:2018mc00025
Movant:
Precision Spine Care
Defendant:
Mabe Trucking Co., Inc.
Tonja Wright v. National Interstate Ins Co., et al
as 18-30683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONJA R. WRIGHT, individually and on behalf of her minor son N.J.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL INTERSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, MABE TRUCKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, TERRY TEARLE POOLE and others
Franco v. Mabe Trucking Co Inc
as 5:2017cv00871
Plaintiff:
David Franco
Defendant:
Mabe Trucking Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mabe v. City Of Texas City et al
as 3:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Linda Mabe
Defendant:
City of Texas City, Texas and Linnard R. Crouch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foreman v. Mabe Trucking Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00756
Plaintiff:
Terrence J Foreman
Defendant:
Mabe Trucking Co Inc and John Doe Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franco v. Mabe Trucking Co., Inc
as 2:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
David Franco
Defendant:
Mabe Trucking Co., Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. National Interstate Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv16214
Plaintiff:
Tonja R. Wright
Defendant:
National Interstate Insurance Company , Mabe Trucking Company, Inc. , Terry Tearle Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
