Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 2:2022cv01258
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Smith v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center
as 5:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dillion
as 2:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Officer Barry Dillion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jim Reece v. Diane Insley, et al
as 18-50296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE INSLEY, Individually and in official capacity as Director of San Marcos Public Library, JOHN DOE, No. 1, "Librarian", Individually and in official capacity, JANE DOE, No. 1, "Librarian", Individually and in official capacity and others
Reece v. Insley et al
as 1:2017cv00813
Defendant:
Marilyn Brister, Michael Cosentino, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
