Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Hill v. Maynard
as 2:2023cv03956
Plaintiff:
Shane L. Hill
Defendant:
Deputy C Maynard and C Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maynard v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Deloris J Maynard
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation, QT South LLC and Alex Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Maynard v. Safeco Insurance Co of Oregon
as 2:2022cv05598
Plaintiff:
Amy V. Maynard and Amy V Maynard
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon and Safeco Insurance Co of Oregon
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Drummer v. Maynard
as 22-40449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cornel Jackie Drummer
Defendant / Appellee:
Ken Maynard, III, Aaron Mohantly, Dr. Hague, Medical Doctor and others
Barnet v. Maynard et al
as 4:2022cv02340
Plaintiff:
Clayton Landon Barnet
Defendant:
Justin A. Maynard, Google, LLC, First Sergeant Terry L. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maynard v. Schneider
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Cody Maynard
Defendant:
L Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Maynard v. Schneider ***TRANSFERRED TO BEAUMONT DIVISION.***
as 9:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Cody Maynard
Defendant:
L Schneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maynard v. Sowell et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cody Maynard
Defendant:
FNU Sowell, FNU Steffy, FNU Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
