Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Hunter v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 3:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Hunter
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union, Mary McDuffie and John Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hannibal v. FCCI Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Kendra Hannibal
Defendant:
Kyles McDuffie, LLC, James McDuffie, FCCI Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McDuffie v. Boulet
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Harold McDuffie
Defendant:
P. Boulet
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Conely v. Blake et al
as 5:2022cv06169
Plaintiff:
Vallie Conely
Defendant:
Mario Blake, Cheryl McDuffy, William Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ragland v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Shelia Ragland
Defendant:
City of Jackson, James Davis, Anthony Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. McDuffy et al
as 4:2021cv01100
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
W. McDuffy, CPR Stalin, Bill Waybourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. McDuffie
as 21-10723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edwin Horton Witherspoon, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Wesley McDuffie
Dixon et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Michael Anthony King, United States of America and Emily Gail Roberts
Plaintiff:
Lauria McDuffy, Anthony Hull and Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Witherspoon v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2020cv01150
Defendant:
Tom Wall, Bill Waybourn, Emily Pedigo and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Horton Witherspoon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
