Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sheriff v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Sheriff
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Chief of Police James E. Davis, Officer Miron B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheriff v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Sheriff
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Jackson Police Department, Chief of Police James E. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. The City of Jackson Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00785
Defendant:
Chief James Davis, John Doe Company 1-5, John Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Almeia Bolden, Tammy Heard, Keith Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noonan-Ortega et al v. City of San Antonio, Texas et al
as 2:2016cv00458
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Noonan-Ortega , Raul Ortega and Thomas Mirone
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Texas, Christian Hernandez, Alix Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miron v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03136
Defendant:
Catherine Miron , Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lou et al v. City of Greenwood et al
as 4:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Leland Lou , Tin S. Lou and Mae Lou
Defendant:
City of Greenwood , Miron B. Smith and L. V. Archie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. Rojas-Miron
as 08-40736
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL ROJAS-MIRON
USA v. Rojas-Miron
as 08-40453
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL ROJAS-MIRON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
