Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Pruitt v. Fab Tech Downhole
as 24-50365
Plaintiff:
Roy Pruitt
Defendant:
Fab Tech Downhole, L.L.C. and Shannon D. Coan
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 6:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron J. Pruitt, Daniel Choate, Homero Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pruitt v. Dykes
as 3:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Michael Wallace Pruitt
Respondent:
Warden Dykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julia Hubbard et al v. Trammell S. Crow, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Julia Hubbard and Kayla Goedinghaus
Defendant:
Trammell S Crow, Jr., Dr. Benjamin Todd Eller, Richard Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. Tarrant Co. Junior College et al
as 4:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
In Re Vicki Pruitt Johnson
Defendant:
Tarrant Co. Junior College, Tarrant Co. Personnel, Civil Service, and Government, City of Fort Worth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pruitt v. C.M.C.F. Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Pruitt
Defendant:
C.M.C.F. Staff, Mississippi, C/O Robinson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Pruitt
as 23-10441
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Austin Jay Pruitt
Pruitt Tool & Supply Co. v. Noble Energy, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Pruitt Tool & Supply Co.
Defendant:
Noble Energy, Inc., NBL Texas, LLC, Rosetta Resources Operating, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
