Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Balistreri-Amrhein, et al v. Universal Insurance Company of North America, et al
as 4:2023cv00776
Defendant:
CEO Gary Moore, Universal Insurance Company of North America, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thornton v. Pittman
as 23-10098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shedrick Thornton
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Michael Pittman, FNU Doyle, Court Coordinator, FNU Brown, Sheriff and others
Thornton v. Pittman et al
as 3:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
Shedrick Thornton
Respondent:
Michael Pittman, FNU Doyle, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Blacknall
as 21-10165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward L. Porter
Defendant / Appellee:
Sherrod Edwards, Sharita Blacknall, Attorney, Verneas Faggett, Court Reporter Stenographer and others
Porter v. Blacknall et al
as 3:2020cv03484
Defendant:
Sharita Blacknall, Verneas Faggett, Sherrod Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Edward L Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Burns
as 3:2019cv02908
Plaintiff:
Alex Perry Neal and Alex Neal
Defendant:
Judge Robert Burns, III and Robert D Burns, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
McCall v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2019cv02063
Defendant:
Russ Henrichs, The State of Texas, Erleigh Norville and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Burns McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert McCall v. Gary Maddox
as 19-10768
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF GARY MADDOX
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BURNS MCCALL
McCall v. Maddox
as 5:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Burns McCall
Defendant:
Sheriff Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
