Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sibley v. Dick
as 23-30744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon Albert Sibley, Howard Gary Brown and Melanie Jerusalem
Defendant / Appellee:
Shelly D. Dick, in both Individual & Official Administrative Capacity, William Brown, United States Marshall, in both Individual & Official capacity, Jeff B., United States Marshal, in both his Individual and & Official Capacity and others
Sanchez-Sanchez v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Segundo Alejandro Sanchez-Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Merrick Garland
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, United States Marshals Service, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Dick
as 23-30540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Howard Gary Brown, Brandon Albert Sibley and Melanie Jerusalem
Defendant / Appellee:
Shelly D. Dick, in both Individual & Official Administrative Capacity, William Brown, United States Marshall, in both Individual & Official capacity, Jeff B., United States Marshal, in both his Individual and & Official Capacity and others
Sibley et al v. Dick et al
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Brandon Albert Sibley and Howard Gary Brown
Defendant:
Shelly D Dick, William Brown, Jeff B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pacheco-Morales v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Defendant:
Detective FNU Young, Ronald L. Davis, Emma Guzmon-Ramon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Davis v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-10864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and DESIGNATION AND SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER
Davis v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 3:2013cv02487
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Davis
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison and DSCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
