Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00885
Petitioner:
Roy Dean Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jacquot
as 22-10305
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Roy Dean Jacquot, III
Collins v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00567
Petitioner:
Roy Dean Smith and Keith A. Collins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Lumpkin - TDCJ Director
as 6:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
Roy Dean Smith
Defendant:
Kathryn J. Jody Gilliam
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gough v. McCain et al
as 1:2019cv01183
Defendant:
Police Jury Grant Parish, Chance Damien Durand, Steven Wayne Fitzhugh and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Gough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-51411
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY DEAN SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Barmore v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2016cv00363
Plaintiff:
Roy Dean Barmore
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dean v. Dean Equipment Inc
as 2:2015cv06901
Defendant:
Dean Equipment Inc
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roy Dean
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Smith v. Livingston
as 6:2015cv00017
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Petitioner:
Roy Dean Smith
Defendant:
William L. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Livingston
as 1:2015cv00055
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Petitioner:
Roy Dean Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
