Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 24-20215
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04293
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Scott Edwards
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Gibson et al v. Fisher et al
as 5:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
James Russell Gibson and Monica Gibson
Defendant:
Scott Edward Fisher, Southern Star Inc and Travelers Property Casualty Co of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rose v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Scott Edward Rose
Defendant:
Travelers Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Scott Grigsby
as 17-10961
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SCOTT EDWARD GRIGSBY, also known as Skinny Pup
Scott Sattler, II v. USA
as 15-51237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT EDWARD SATTLER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sattler v. The United States of America
as 1:2015cv00690
Plaintiff:
Scott Edward Sattler, II
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 701 Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
