Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,570
United States of America v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Tammy McDaniel and Harvey McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
LaMartina v. Madden
as 24-30381
Plaintiff: Elise LaMartina
Defendant: Clay Madden, Gerald Sticker, Stephen Baehr and others
Ewing v. Back et al
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff: Steven Guy Ewing
Defendant: J. Back and Tammy W. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. MidFirst Bank
as 5:2024cv00660
Plaintiff: Tammy Eaton
Defendant: MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Gregory Jay Harrison and Gregory Harrison
Defendant: Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Tammy Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trinh v. Tran
as 4:2024cv02113
Plaintiff: Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant: Minh-Tam Tammy Tran
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Zeiger v. Mosley et al
as 4:2024cv02093
Plaintiff: Tammy Zeiger
Defendant: George W Mosley and Mosley's Frenchies & Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rabor v. SSI SSD et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff: Tammy Rabor
Defendant: SSI SSD, FNU Heard, FNU Smith and others
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Houghton v. Malin Integrated Handling Solutions & Design
as 2:2024cv01311
Not Yet Classified: malin Integrated
Plaintiff: Tammy Houghton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?