Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Thompkins v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv01761
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Toronzo D Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompkins v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv02081
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office, Harris County, City Of Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Calderon v. Norsworthy et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Agustin Calderon
Respondent:
Christopher L. Norsworthy, Angela N. Chavelier, Hollis Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Norsworthy et al
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Agustin Calderon
Defendant:
Christopher L. Norsworthy, Angela N. Chavelier, Hollis Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompkins et al v. Liberty Personal Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Donald Thompkins and Dollie Thompkins
Defendant:
Liberty Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Merryman v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Bruce R Merryman
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, James Danheim and Aaron Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peyton v. Thompkins
as 3:2021cv02173
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Bryan Peyton
Respondent:
Aaron Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peyton v. Thompkins
as 7:2021cv00082
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Bryan Peyton
Respondent:
Aaron Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGee v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant:
Warden FNU Armstrong, Major FNU Voyles, Officer FNU Montenegro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Arron Thompkins, Brian Collier, Janet Haney and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
