Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones vs. Cooley
as 2:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jones and Tryone Jones
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. GEICO General Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00916
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jones and Joseph McCrory
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones v. Shelby County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2021cv02711
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Department and Shelby Mob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Childress County 100th District Court
as 5:2021cv00190
Petitioner:
Christopher Tyrone Jones
Respondent:
Childress County 100th District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guillermo Lerma v. Robert Stevens, et al
as 17-10185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUILLERMO MORENO LERMA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT K. STEVENS, Warden I, TYRONE JONES, Sergeant of Corrections Officer, JENIFER A. MARES, Corrections Officer and others
Jones v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00312
Petitioner:
Anthony Tyrone Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lerma v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Moreno Lerma
Defendant:
Robert K Stevens, Tyrone Jones, Jenifer A Mares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2013cv00685
Defendant:
Angela Easom and Leslie Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2012cv05242
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
City of Dallas and Dallas Municipal Court Collection
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
