Cases 1 - 10 of 2,534
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Apodaca v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Victor v. Lafayette Consolidated Government et al
as 6:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Antoine Victor
Defendant:
Lafayette Consolidated Government, John Doe and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 24-20169
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bullard v. Tidewater Transit Co., Inc.
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wayne Bullard
Defendant:
Tidewater Transit Co., Inc. and Victor Wood Helms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aninao v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association as Trustee of the Igloo Series IV Trust et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
VICTOR ANTONIO ANINAO and MAGALY VAZQUEZ ANINAO
Defendant:
US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE OF THE IGLOO SERIES IV TRUST and SN SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
