Cases 1 - 10 of 1,454
Ward v. Bisley International, LLC. et al
as 4:2024cv03283
Defendant:
William Buckley, Bisley International, LLC., Goodnight Terminal Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Upton et al v. Moulds et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Defendant:
The City of Columbia, Mississippi, Michael Kelly, Seth Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ginger Upton and Sarah Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00492
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Plaintiff:
Cordeyair Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Sheriff Ward Calhoun and Lauderdale County
Plaintiff:
Decamron Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Naylor v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00488
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun, III
Plaintiff:
Jason Leshun Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riche v. Forrest County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
David Ward, Yahshu Jackson, Forrest County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Riche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2024cv02027
Petitioner:
Terriaun Deshaun Ward
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Naylor v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jason Leshun Naylor
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
