Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Marble v. Forrest General Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Salinas Marble
Defendant:
Forrest General Hospital, Dr. John Doe, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkes v. Cargill, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Wilkes
Defendant:
Cargill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Wilks v. Borgwarner Emission Systems, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00073
Defendant:
Borgwarner Emission Systems, LLC, Cigna Healthcare, Inc., John Does 1,2 and 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Wilks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibson et al v. City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Toby Barker, Forrest County and others
Plaintiff:
HL&C McLeod, LLC, HL&C Forrest, LLC and Mark Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Wilks et al
as 2:2021cv00010
Plaintiff:
Georgio Rodriquez Scott
Defendant:
Forrest County and Gwen Wilks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilks v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00168
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Eric Lydell Wilks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd. et al
as 3:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Theresa Jan Michaels, Lucius Olen Crosby Gammill, Jennifer Lynn Gammill McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. Wilks
as 2:2020cv00102
Plaintiff:
Alex-Wayne Duncan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Gwen Wilks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkes v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00250
Defendant:
Redbox Automated Retail, LLC, John Does I-V, Aadvantage Relocation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Perdue et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Charles Raymond Joyner, Homer Wilkes, Kerry Sims and others
Plaintiff:
Willie P. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
