Cases 11 - 20 of 193
Austin v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Austin
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Nathan M. Doty and others
Debtor:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Lexington-Fayette County Urban Government et al
as 5:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Andru Jackson Phillips
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette County Urban Government, Cory B. Vinlove, Donnell Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. USA et al
as 6:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Dominique Johnson
Defendant:
USA, Warden Gomez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lovins v. USA
as 5:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Phillip Lovins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. Keith et al
as 6:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
Phillip Keith, State Automobile Mutual Insurance Companies and Auto Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Patton v. Phillips et al
as 7:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
James Patton
Defendant:
Lance Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
