Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Briggs v. Graham et al
as 4:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Frank Briggs
Defendant:
Justin Graham and Clinton Linder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Todd County et al
as 1:2020cv00210
Defendant:
Todd County, Vernon Albro, Kentucky State Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Senay v. Hopkins County Jail et al
as 4:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Senay
Defendant:
Officer Lampton, Brittany Helton, Officer Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Plastics Engineering Company et al
as 1:2018cv00134
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David H. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Louisville Metro Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00383
Plaintiff:
Artius J. Graham
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections , Trinity Services Group and Louisville Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neal v. Vanhoose et al
as 3:2018cv00125
Petitioner:
Roy C. Neal
Respondent:
Lelia A. Vanhoose, Larry R. Brock, Michael A. Bolcas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benton v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
Louisville Metropolitan Government, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Mark Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Bottom
as 1:2016cv00170
Petitioner:
Norman Graham
Respondent:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mayer et al v. David Graham Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Mayer
Defendant:
David Graham Trucking, LLC , Ryan Romig , Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
