Cases 1 - 10 of 288
Haga v. Lawn Care and More Inc. et al (JRG3)
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gage Haga
Defendant:
Lawn Care and More Inc. and John C. Bushong
Webb, et al v. Tenn Mor Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kathryn WEBB
Defendant:
TENN MOR PROPERTIES, LLC, Adam Tripp, Tina K Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Strobl et al v. Croft et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Stacy Strobl and Brian Harding
Defendant:
Paul Croft, Jonathan Frost, Rhino Onward International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Patterson et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Donovan Mitchell Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Patterson and Corey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnpier v. Prince et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Gordon Johnpier
Defendant:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing and Dr. Kenneth Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Hughes
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Brown
Defendant:
Matthew Scott and Jason Mosier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnpier et al v. Prince et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Petitioner:
Gordon Blake Johnpier and Dustin Lee Hopper
Respondent:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing, Charles Ricket and others
Defendant:
Dr. Kenneth Matthews and All Healthcare Providers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Pigeon Forge Police Department
as 3:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Pigeon Forge Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
