Cases 41 - 50 of 261
Davis et al v. Lee
as 2:2021cv02573
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Andrew Sidney Phillips, Samuel Matthews and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Carpenter et al
as 2:2021cv02533
Plaintiff:
Latonia Moore
Defendant:
Phillip Carpenter, George Gibbs, L & B Transport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Gibbs et al
as 2:2021cv02536
Plaintiff:
Latonia Moore
Defendant:
George Gibbs, Phillip Carpenter, WTI Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Comcast et al
as 2:2021cv02376
Defendant:
Devon Self Storage, Ricky Smith, Joe Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Tamera Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Owens et al
as 2:2021cv02270
Defendant:
Creig Pickles, Doe and Owens
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ram Tool & Supply Co., Inc v. Phillip Smith Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01054
Defendant:
Tyson Farms, Inc., Gray Construction, Inc., Phillip T. Smith and others
Not Classified By Court:
Amanda Brown
Plaintiff:
Ram Tool & Supply Co., Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips v. Henry et al
as 2:2021cv02157
Petitioner:
Prentiss Antonio Phillips
Respondent:
Darl Bell, Dentist Thomas Henry and Donna Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Erie Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv01024
Defendant:
Erie Insurance Company
Not Classified By Court:
Kathy Blount
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
