Cases 11 - 20 of 5,713
MELKOWSKI v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04827
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MELKOWSKI
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Arakji v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 5:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Mazen Arakji
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Amazon, Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. APPLE CORING & CUTTING CORP.
as 2:2024cv06753
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
APPLE CORING & CUTTING CORP.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Mahon v. Apple Inc., et al.
as 24-3571
Plaintiff:
MARK MAHON
Defendant:
APPLE INC., ITUNES STORE and APPLE DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Mirage Wine Spirits, Inc. Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Mirage Wine & Spirits
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Visa Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carnahan v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Carnahan
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Carnahan v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Carnahan
Garnishee:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Carnahan v. Apple Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Carnahan
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
