Cases 111 - 120 of 827,903
Sax et al v. Bell Textron, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Amber Sax, Avery Rasmuson, Emily Baxter and others
Defendant:
Bell Textron, Inc., The Boeing Company, Rolls-Royce Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 al Diversity-Airline Crash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk07684
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk15246
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Green v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
Brounche S. Green
Defendant:
R. Hill and Folsom State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Frontier Management, LLC, et al
as 24-1900
Plaintiff:
CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, now known as CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, S.I.
Defendant:
FRONTIER MANAGEMENT, LLC, WELLTOWER TENANT GROUP, doing business as THE AUBERGE AT ORCHARD PARK and CHARLES NEDOSS, Independnet Executor of the estate of BERTRAND NEDOSS
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1154
Petitioner:
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1153
Petitioner:
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
