Cases 91 - 100 of 71,181
Be the Bush Recovery Ministries v. Coffee County, TN
as 24-5538
Plaintiff:
BE THE BUSH RECOVERY MINISTRIES
Defendant:
COFFEE COUNTY, TN
Karri Stevens, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 24-1494
Plaintiff:
KARRI L. STEVENS and CORRINA D. COOPER
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, ALBERT BOURLA, Pfizer Official, VANESSA GELMAN, Pfizer Official and others
Outdoor One Communications LLC v. Charter Township of Canton, MI
as 24-1496
Plaintiff:
OUTDOOR ONE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Defendant:
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, MI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Bradley et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Jalen Bradley and Ja-Dawn Bradley
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, The City of Columbus Division of Police, Carl Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ellis v. Meigs County et al
as 2:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
Charles Ellis
Defendant:
Meigs County, Donald Scott Fitch, Marty Hutton, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stein v. Howell et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stein
Defendant:
Officer Rodney N Howell, Officer Ashley Henschen, Officer Alec Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States Government
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Travis B Williams
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli
Defendant:
Joseph A. Woodruff, Estate of Kimberly Helper, John Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
