Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 100,189
Stone v. McKenzie
as 3:2024cv00366
Petitioner: Dante' Corvette Stone
Respondent: Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yates v. Krow
as 5:2024cv00116
Petitioner: Richard Yates
Respondent: Ivan Krow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Douglas
as 2:2024cv11573
Petitioner: Kalvin Lamar Washington
Respondent: Adam Douglas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tillie #636229 v. Lofton et al
as 1:2024cv00625
Plaintiff: Phillip Randall Tillie #636229
Defendant: Unknown Lofton, Unknown Ward, Unknown Bielas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris #440974 v. Singerling et al
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Dejuan Harris #440974
Defendant: Nicholas Singerling and Shane Hoag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boles #156632 v. Sisco et al
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Boles #156632, Jr.
Defendant: Savannah P. Sisco, Kevin S. Dirschell and Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grossman #621120 v. Neubecker et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Shawn Paul Grossman #621120
Defendant: M. Neubecker, Thomas O. Mohrman, Unknown St. Onge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Watwood
as 3:2024cv00737
Petitioner: Anthony Cartwright
Respondent: Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
England v. Lovette et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Timothy E. England
Defendant: Warden Lovette and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?