Cases 31 - 40 of 214
Dunlap v. Fish et al
as 3:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunlap
Defendant:
Robin Fish, Lakeia Wells, f/n/u Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snider v. Cindy et al
as 2:2023cv10306
Plaintiff:
Joshua Snider
Defendant:
Cindy, Daryl Parker and Well Path Corporation
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Key v. Sherell et al
as 3:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Clinton Edward Key
Defendant:
Tonya Sherell, Well Path, Nashville TN Metro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04420
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Michael Vincent Harmon
Defendant:
Sarah Jessie Ferguson, Sargent Brent Bond, Officer Christopher L. Vezina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Puckett et al
as 3:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Brice Jamar Rhodes
Defendant:
D. Puckett, Jerry Collins, Charels Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Averhart v. Collins et al
as 3:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
LaMario Contrell Averhart
Defendant:
Jerry Collins, Teresa Wallace, Well Path Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paris Wells v. USA
as 22-1652
Petitioner / Appellant:
PARIS STEPHEN WELLS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wells v. Sullivan County Criminal Court
as 1:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Kevin F Wells
Respondent:
Sullivan County Criminal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
